Education Software Development
An Education Software Development Company For Platforms That Last
Learning platforms are judged on one morning a year, when every student logs in at once. Stallyons is a Delaware-registered US company whose senior engineers work your hours, on one contract, with your IP signed and student data rules agreed before any access.
Triple Protection Guarantee
- US-Registered Entity
- Signed IP Assignment
- Education Engineers
Triple Protection Guarantee:
- US-Registered Entity
- Signed IP Assignment
- Education Engineers
Years In Business
0
+
Engineers On Staff
0
+
Avg. Engineer Exp.
0
+
Why Learning Stalls
One Student View
Not Copies
Senior Engineers
Vetted Only
Standards First
LTI Ready
Roster Syncing
Kept Current
Accessibility
WCAG 2.2
Data Security
Access Rules
Term Start Ready
Load Tested
Communication Rhythm
Daily Sync
Exam Integrity
Auditable
IP Assignment
Signed
Delivery Overlap
Fixed
Hours
Code & IP Owner
You
Trusted By Startups
What Education Software Development Involves
Education software carries constraints most business systems never meet. The calendar is fixed and unforgiving, the users range from a seven-year-old to a registrar, accessibility is a legal duty rather than a nice-to-have, and the data belongs to people who did not choose to be in your system. On top of that sits a set of interoperability standards, because a learning platform that cannot exchange rosters, grades and content is an island the institution has to staff around.
Stallyons is registered in Delaware as a US company, and our senior engineers work inside a time-zone window you set, with four-plus hours of daily overlap. You sign a US contract, run diligence on a US entity and pay one US invoice. The engineers on your account average four-plus years of production experience across custom software, integrations and systems with sharp seasonal peaks, backed by twelve-plus years of delivery across six continents for institutions, training providers and EdTech founders.
What Education Work Covers
One record per learner, not several: identity, enrolment, progress and results held once, so a tutor, a registrar and a parent portal are all reading the same history rather than three partial copies of it.
Interoperability treated as a requirement: LTI, SCORM, xAPI, OneRoster and QTI designed in from the start, because retrofitting a standard into a finished platform costs more than building to it did.
Accessibility engineered, not audited late: keyboard paths, screen reader semantics and contrast handled while components are built, then tested with assistive technology rather than a scanner alone.
Assessment you can defend: item banks, timed attempts, resits, moderation and an audit trail, so a disputed mark can be reconstructed months later without anyone guessing.
Capacity planned around the calendar: enrolment week and the first day of term get load tested in advance, because that is when the platform earns or loses its reputation.
Student data handled deliberately: minimal collection, scoped access, clear retention, and designs that respect FERPA, COPPA and GDPR-K obligations wherever your learners are based.
Why Institutions Choose A Custom Learning Platform Build
- Ask which standards they have implemented, not which they have heard of. LTI 1.3 with deep linking is a different conversation from a link that opens in a frame.
- Ask what happens at nine o'clock on the first day of term. Anyone who has run an institution talks about queues, caching and a rehearsal before servers.
- Ask how rosters stay current. Nightly imports drift, and the drift shows up as a student who cannot see the class they are sitting in.
- Ask when accessibility gets tested. If the answer is a scan near the end, expect a remediation project afterwards that costs more than doing it as you go.
- Ask how a disputed grade is investigated. Attempt history, timestamps and moderation notes should be retrievable without an engineer running a query.
- Ask where course content ends up. If it only exports as a proprietary bundle, you have bought a platform and rented everything you put inside it.
How To Start An Education Software Project
Every engagement starts with a free 45-minute working session. No slide deck, no sales script. You bring the academic calendar, the systems and the constraints; you leave with a recommended approach, a clear scope and a timeline.
We are selective about new engagements and cap how many we run at once, because the vetting is the product. If we cannot staff your education work with engineers we would vouch for, we will tell you so.
Why Clients Choose Us
Full
Written IP Transfer
USA
Contract Entity
Yours
Learner Records
Named
Senior Level
Ready to build a platform that survives enrolment week?
What We Build In Education
What You Can Build For Education Teams
Education work goes well when the academic calendar sets the plan and the data owner is named early. These are the builds we take on most often, each with an agreed scope, an overlap window and one review standard.
LMS & Course Delivery
Modules, cohorts, progress, certs
Live Term
Student Records
One profile across every system
Single Source
Assessment Engine
Item banks, scoring, retakes, marks
Reported
Live & Virtual Classes
Rooms, recordings, attendance
Joins In One Click
SIS Bridge
PowerSchool, Banner, Workday
Two-Way Sync
Learning Analytics
Progress, risk, intervention
Readable
Standards & Interop
LTI, SCORM, xAPI, OneRoster
Linked
Accessibility & QA
WCAG audits, screen readers, keyboard
Sign-Off
Legacy LMS Migration
Courses, users, grades, history
Future-Proof
Support & Maintenance
Monitoring, fixes, releases, cover
Kept Running
Not sure what your institution needs first? Let's map it.
Common Challenges
Why Do Learning Platforms Stall?
Six patterns behind almost every learning platform that became painful to run. None of them are about teaching.
Standards Guessed
01
A tool is launched inside a frame and called an integration. Then grades need to pass back, a roster needs deep linking, and the whole thing is rebuilt against LTI 1.3 the following summer instead.
Term-Start Collapse
02
The platform is comfortable all summer, then twelve thousand people sign in inside ten minutes. Nobody rehearsed that hour, so everybody experiences it together.
Roster Sync Drifts
03
Enrolments arrive overnight as a file, so a student who transferred on Monday cannot open Tuesday's class. Support fixes it by hand and nobody counts how often.
Access Added Late
04
Accessibility is scheduled as a check near launch. The scan finds issues in components used on every page, and the fix reopens work that was signed off two quarters earlier.
Assessments Left Open
05
Attempts, timings and moderation are not recorded properly, so a disputed grade cannot be reconstructed. The academic argument then becomes an engineering investigation.
Course Content Locked In
06
Years of course material only exists inside one vendor's format. Changing platform now means rebuilding the content, so the decision keeps getting deferred.
Recognise a few of these? Let's fix the cause.
Our Education Services
Six Education Software Development Services
Six ways to add education engineering capacity from one accountable vendor. Run one, or run several under a single contract.
Learning Platform Builds
01
A platform built around your academic model rather than a vendor's: courses, cohorts, roles and progression as you actually run them, with a named lead who reports into you.
LMS & LXP Development
02
Course delivery, authoring, pathways and certification, either as a new build or as the parts your current system cannot do, integrated through published standards.
Assessment & Proctoring
03
Item banks, timed attempts, resits, moderation and integrity controls, with an audit trail complete enough to answer an appeal months later.
SIS & Roster Integration
04
Student information systems, rostering and single sign-on wired together through documented APIs, so enrolment changes land in minutes.
Accessibility Engineering
05
WCAG work done in the component layer alongside interface design, then verified with real assistive technology rather than a scanner.
Education Data & Analytics
06
Progress dashboards, retention signals and reporting built on one set of figures, so academic staff and finance stop arriving at meetings with different numbers.
Not sure which education workstream comes first? Let's scope it.
Why Choose Us
What Makes Our Education Software Development Different
The details that decide whether a learning platform is still easy to run in its third academic year.
A US Legal Entity
01
Stallyons is registered in Delaware. Your contract, your invoice and your legal recourse sit with a US company, not an unknown one.
Education Domain Depth
02
Terms, cohorts, resits and moderation come up in week one, because our engineers have built against an academic calendar before.
Overlap You Set
03
You choose the hours we share with your working day, and stand-ups, reviews and escalations all happen inside that window.
Standards Handled
04
LTI, SCORM, xAPI, QTI and OneRoster are designed in from the first sprint, because a standard retrofitted later is a rebuild wearing a smaller name.
Reviewed Code
05
Every merge is reviewed against an agreed definition of done, on your board, where you can read it yourself.
One Contract
06
One contract covers the engagement, so procurement, legal and finance each deal with a single named counterparty.
Ready to see what an education build looks like?
Our Process
From First Call To Education Delivery In Six Steps
A process built around your academic calendar, so nothing critical lands mid-term.
Discovery
Map the systems, calendar, hours and budget
Scoping
Agree the scope, standards and term dates
Select
Meet and approve the engineers on your account
Contracting
NDA, IP assignment, access and onboarding
Deliver
Work on your board, reviewed on merge
Review & Scale
Regular reviews, adjust the scope as needed
Want to see how this maps to your roadmap?
Technology Stack
The Technology Stack Behind Our Education Builds
Modern, battle-tested tooling across every layer of a learning platform: app, standards, media, data.
Learning Stack
Next.js / React
Node.js APIs
Python / Django
Laravel API
TypeScript
Standards & Integration
LTI 1.3 Apps
SCORM & xAPI Data
OneRoster API
QTI 3.0
SSO: SAML & OIDC
Video & Live
HLS Transcoding
WebRTC Rooms
Captions & Transcripts
CDN Delivery
Adaptive Learning AI
Data & Records
PostgreSQL SIS
MongoDB Docs
Redis Cache
Gradebook Engine
Learning Analytics
Cloud & DevOps
AWS / GCP / Azure
Docker / K8s
Terraform / IaC
GitHub Actions / CI
Selenium / Datadog
Education Sectors
Education Software For Sectors With Strict Rules
Engineers who already know your calendar, your standards and your reporting duties spend month one shipping work.
K-12 School Systems
Rostering, safeguarding, parents
Universities & Colleges
Enrolment, credits, timetabling
Corporate Training
Compliance, cohorts, certificates
Vocational & Skills
Competencies, evidence, assessors
EdTech Product Firms
Multi-tenant, billing, onboarding
Publishers & Courseware
Authoring, licensing, delivery
Test & Assessment
Item banks, scoring, proctoring
Language & Tutoring Apps
Scheduling, sessions, progress
We know how institutions run. Let's build the plan.
How We Compare
Custom Education Software vs An Off-The-Shelf LMS
An honest look at your three education options.
| Capability | Off-The-Shelf LMS | Freelance Build | Generalist Web Agency | Stallyons Technologies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interoperability standards | Vendor's subset | ✕ Iframe embed | ✕ Unfamiliar | LTI, SCORM, xAPI, QTI |
| Roster and SSO sync | Nightly import | Manual upload | ✕ Out of scope | OneRoster, SAML, OIDC |
| Accessibility approach | Vendor statement | ✕ Not considered | Scanned at the end | WCAG built into components |
| Assessment audit trail | Reports only | ✕ None | ✕ None | Attempts, timings, moderation |
| Term-start capacity | Shared tenancy | ✕ Never tested | Untested at peak | Rehearsed and load tested |
| Student data handling | Vendor's terms | ✕ Ad hoc | Generic policy | Designed around FERPA and GDPR-K |
| Contracting entity | Vendor licence | ✕ Platform terms | Local entity | US-registered LLC |
See the difference for yourself
Complete Engagement
Everything Included In An Education Software Build
From Scoping to Contracting to Delivery, One Vendor
Here's everything included in an education software engagement with us:
All-Inclusive Education Delivery: No Hidden Fees, No Surprises.
Every education engagement includes all eight components above. One contract, one senior team, one predictable cost, no vendor sprawl.
🔒 No obligation. We'll deliver a detailed proposal within 48 hours.
Plus, Get These Free Bonuses
Free Platform Review
A written read on your learning platform: standards support, roster reliability, accessibility gaps, term-start capacity, and the three fixes that pay back first.
Included Free
Delivery Plan & Estimate
A phased delivery plan with scope, milestones, a stack recommendation and a transparent, itemized estimate for the engagement.
Included Free
Free EdTech Checklist
The questions we would ask any education vendor about standards, rostering, accessibility and student data, so you can ask us the same ones.
Included Free
Risk-Free Partnership
Our Education Delivery Promise
We stand behind every engagement with commitments that protect your investment.
01
Scope Agreed First
Scope, model, working hours and cost structure are written down and agreed before contracting, so nothing is discovered later.
02
Built to Last
Senior developers, code review, automated tests, security and accessibility audits, and clean, documented code you fully own.
03
IP And Access Protected
NDA and IP assignment are signed before access, permissions are scoped per person, and your accounts stay under your control.
Start your education build with confidence, backed by our Triple Protection Guarantee.
Track Record
Engagements That Ship, Scale, and Compound
500+
Projects Delivered
29+
Service Categories
81%
Repeat Client Rate
4.9 ★
Clutch Rating
"We came to Stallyons after burning two years and four vendors on a multi-platform launch that kept slipping. They scoped it end-to-end — web app, iOS, Android, an AI summarization layer, and a Shopify integration — and shipped it in 22 weeks. One team, one budget, one quality bar. We've handed them three more engagements since."
Mark Sawyer
CEO/Founder
PlatinumLED
"Stallyons rebuilt our customer-facing portal, integrated three legacy systems, shipped an AI document analysis pipeline, and brought our compliance posture to SOC 2 — all under one engagement. The senior engineers on the team have shipped at companies five times our size. It's the best vendor decision we've made in a decade."
Mark Sawyer
CEO/Founder
PlatinumLED
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions On Education Software
Education software development is building the systems teaching and administration run on: learning platforms, student records, assessment engines, timetabling, reporting, and the integrations that hold them together. What separates it from ordinary product work is the constraints. The calendar is fixed, accessibility is a legal duty, interoperability standards are expected, and the data belongs to learners who did not opt in.
Both, and the honest answer usually depends on how much of your current system you actually dislike. Where the platform is sound and the gaps are specific, we build alongside it through LTI and its APIs, which is faster and cheaper than replacing it. Where the academic model has been bent to fit vendor assumptions for years, a custom build pays for itself. We tell you which of the two we think it is during scoping, before anyone commits.
It moves with how many systems must interoperate, how strict your accessibility and reporting duties are, and how much existing content and history has to migrate. Any single number quoted before scoping is a guess. Standards work, assessment integrity and migration of years of course material are the three areas most often underestimated.
As design constraints, from the first sprint. We collect the minimum a feature needs, scope access per role, agree retention up front and keep an audit trail of who read what. Designs are built to respect FERPA, COPPA and GDPR-K obligations depending on where your learners are. Your institution holds the legal duty; our job is to build so you can meet it.
You do, from the first commit. NDA and IP assignment are signed before anyone gets repository or system access, with no licence-back and no shared ownership. Repositories, cloud accounts, learner data and documentation live in your own name throughout, so there is nothing to negotiate back later.
Yes, and we treat them as requirements rather than extras. LTI 1.3 with deep linking and grade pass-back, SCORM and xAPI for content and activity data, QTI for assessment items and OneRoster for rostering all get designed in early. Retrofitting a standard into a finished platform reliably costs more than building to it in the first place.
Included, and handled in the component layer rather than as a pass near launch. Keyboard paths, focus order, screen reader semantics and contrast are decided when a component is built, then verified with real assistive technology. A scanner catches perhaps half of what matters, which is why a late scan so often turns into a remediation project.
That is the hour we plan for. Sign-in, timetable and course-list traffic are modelled on your own enrolment numbers, then load tested and rehearsed before the date, with caching, queueing and a rollback path agreed in advance. Capacity is decided against your calendar rather than average traffic, because the average never causes the problem.
Still have questions? Let's talk.
Schedule an appointment with us today!
Ready to Build A Platform Teaching Can Trust?
Get a free consultation. We'll review your learning platform, recommend a sequence, and send a detailed written proposal.
